Lowest Cost Cloud Load Testing Tool

web server performance

Server Monitoring in Windows Azure

server monitoring in Windows AzureIf you are hosting your web application in Windows Azure, here are some tips regarding monitoring your servers and application during a LoadStorm test that were provided to me from a Microsoft software engineer:

Sharing with you the steps for performance testing/bottleneck identification. Attaching all the requisite documents and counters.

Explanation of perfmon counters - http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa905154(SQL.80).aspx

Other tools we use:

  • Logman (built into system) – to control performance counters
  • Logparser – when you want to evaluate http://logparserplus.com/
  • DMVs - http://gallery.technet.microsoft.com/ScriptCenter/en-us/


Ways to Use Perfmon Counters Config File via Command

Web Server Performance Benchmarks

G-WAN Rules in Static Benchmark Test Battery

Over at his blog Spoot!, Nicolas Bonvin recently posted two summaries of the great work he's done benchmarking how well various open-source and free Web servers dish up static content under high loads. Bonvin, a PhD. student at the …cole polytechnique fÈdÈrale de Lausanne (EPFL in Switzerland, specializes in high-volume distributed data systems, and brings considerable expertise and real-world experience to bear in designing his tests.

First Round of Performance Testing

In his first post, Bonvin laid out the evidence he'd accumulated by running benchmark tests against six Web servers: Apache MPM-worker, Apache MPM-event, Nginx, Varnish, G-WAN, and Cherokee, all running on a 64-bit Ubuntu build. (All Web servers used, save for G-WAN, were 64-bit.) This first set of benchmarks was run without any server optimization; each server was deployed with its default settings. Bonvin measured minimum, maximum, and average requests per second (RPS) for each server. All tests were performed locally, eliminating network latency from the equation.

On this initial test battery, G-WAN was the clear winner on every conceivable benchmark, with Cherokee placing second, Nginx and Varnish close to tied, and both strains of Apache coming in dead last. As Bonvin notes, it wasn't even close. G-WAN, a small Web server built for high performance, completed 2.25 more requests per second than Cherokee (its closest competitor), and served a whopping 9 to 13.5 more requests per second than the two versions of Apache.

Storm on Demand - Pay Per Test

Storm on Demand Users Cost
250 $9.97
500 $19.95
1,000 $39.90
5,000 $199.50
10,000 $399.00
25,000 $997.50
50,000 $1,995.00

performance testing sign upIt's easy. You can be load testing in 15 minutes.

  1. Click the "Free Account" button.
  2. Enter your name & email address.
  3. Click the confirmation link in an email.
  4. Create a test scenario for your site.
  5. Run a load test.
  6. Analyze the test results.
  7. Send us a testimonial because you are amazed!

Best Load Testing Tool

"LoadStorm I love you and I am gladly going to pay for your services!" - Bernardo Rivas Carillo, Software Development Engineer in Test, Wirestone

"Excellent product – quick and easy to set up, great analytics tools, and affordable." - Mislav Kos, Application Developer, Soliant Consulting

"We can only wish that more of our vendors would be so responsive and accommodating as LoadStorm." - Miguel Picornell, VP Operations, Optaros, Inc.

"Great load testing tool! It's exactly what we need. I think the world of the service!" - Rafael Santander, Performance Engineer, OffandAway.com

"LoadStorm...awesome product!" - Kaine Escott, CEO, Harvey Norman Big Buys

"Thanks for the help and the great customer service!" - Andrew Glenn, CTO, Group Commerce Inc.

"Thank you alot! LoadStorm is essential for us to ensure the best performance & scalability." Claudio Bianchi, CEO, FreeSharewareDepot

Want a Live Demo? Have Questions?

Please feel free to contact:

Scott Price
Vice President
(970) 389-1899 mobile

Click here to submit a testimonial